The Spoils System versus the Merit System

The Spoils System versus the Merit System


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

When a political party comes to power, its leaders tend to place many of their faithful followers into important public offices. The use of public offices as rewards for political party work is known as the "Spoils System." The system is popular in numerous nations.Many consider this practice warranted when capable persons are appointed to high places where policy is made. They hold that the party in power must craft policy to meet its constituents' needs. On the other hand, it is unwarranted when political leaders dismiss able persons from positions that do not make policy. They do this to haul aboard others whose merit consists merely of party loyalty, thus compromising governmental effectiveness.It was once commonly assumed that the spoils system in the United States came into general use first during Andrew Jackson's presidency. President Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican, favored a policy of keeping rival Federalists out of government offices.By 1840, the spoils system was widely used in local, state and federal government. In 1841, when William Henry Harrison became president, the practice had reached groaning proportions.Between 30,000 and 40,000 office-seekers converged on the Capital to scramble for 23,700 jobs that then comprised the federal service. In the early days, government work was simple.However, as government grew, a serious need for qualified workers developed. The gross scandals of President Ulysses S. Grant's administration lent credence to the efforts of reformers George W. Curtis, Dorman B. Eaton and Carl Schurz.In 1871, Congress authorized the president to set regulations for admission to public service and appoint the oversight Civil Service Commission. However, this merit system ended in 1875 because of Congress's failure to provide the funds to see it through.Nevertheless, the experiment proved the merit system to be both functional and supportive. President Rutherford B. Hayes was enamored of reform and began to use competitive examinations as a basis for office appointments.In 1881, a spurned office-seeker shot and killed President James A. Garfield. His bill became the Civil Service Act of 1883 and re-established the Civil Service Commission. The Act rendered it unlawful to fill various federal offices by the spoils system.Since then, much has been done to avoid the evils of the system. Many municipalities and states have made training and experience the prerequisites of appointment to public office.


Watch the video: Merit system u0026 Spoil system Mizo ṭawngin